The ejectment order against provincial government case law pakistan Diaries
The ejectment order against provincial government case law pakistan Diaries
Blog Article
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Modest fees utilize.
Stacy, a tenant inside of a duplex owned by Martin, filed a civil lawsuit against her landlord, claiming he experienced not provided her adequate notice before raising her rent, citing a new state regulation that needs a minimum of ninety days’ notice. Martin argues that The brand new regulation applies only to landlords of large multi-tenant properties.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can deliver inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
The Supreme Court's explanation from Fida Muhammad v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others (2021 SCMR 1895), Evidently distinguished between up-gradation and promotion. Promotion requires a shift to a higher position with increased responsibilities and rank. Upgradation, within the other hand, delivers financial relief by putting an employee in a higher pay back scale, without modifying their career duties or position. It is a system designed to address the stagnation of employees who have remained during the same spend scale for a protracted time, particularly when they lack opportunities for promotion. Upgradation can be a policy Software used to alleviate the hardship of prolonged-term stagnation. Read more
Whilst there isn't any prohibition against referring to case law from a state other than the state in which the case is being listened to, it holds little sway. Still, if there is not any precedent inside the home state, relevant case regulation from another state could be thought of because of the court.
When the state court hearing the case reviews the legislation, he finds that, though it mentions large multi-tenant properties in certain context, it is actually actually pretty imprecise about whether the ninety-working day provision applies to all landlords. The judge, based about the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held to your ninety-day notice necessity, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
Various judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of a crime does not represent a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in putting the Petitioner's name over the ECL based over the criminal case are inconsistent with recognized legal principles. Consequently, this petition must be allowed Read more
Only the written opinions of the Supreme Court as well as Court of Appeals are routinely readily available. Decisions from the lessen (trial) courts will not be generally published or dispersed.
139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Relating the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 of the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is not served, the grievance petition is often dismissed. This is because service with the grievance notice is really a mandatory necessity along with a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The legislation involves that a grievance notice be served to the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. If your employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) In the event the organization is transprovincial.
12 . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair to your offender and the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and from other courts but they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and involve all notable cases decided through the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
17 . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have read the realized counsel for your parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues of your matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to your interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) in the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession of your subjected premises on the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to get decided by the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer inside the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this part for interim custody of the topic premises In case the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan check here Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, Additionally it is a very well-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is subject matter into the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings to the evidence.